Mooney v. Robinson
This text of 8 Misc. 692 (Mooney v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by the plaintiffs for professional services.
The answer of the defendant was a general denial.
On the trial of the action the only question raised was that of employment.
The plaintiffs claimed employment by an agent of the defendant and a subsequent ratification by the defendant.
The trial justice properly submitted the question of retainer to the jury, and they having found for the plaintiff the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Conlan, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Misc. 692, 28 N.Y.S. 1149, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooney-v-robinson-nynyccityct-1894.