Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

8 N.Y.S. 956, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917

DecidedJanuary 15, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.Y.S. 956 (Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co., 8 N.Y.S. 956, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The chief judge, before whom this case was tried, and to whom the requests to find should therefore have been properly submitted, having, upon all the papers presented upon this appeal, determined that the defendant’s requests objected to were not properly presented to him, and all the facts being within his knowledge at the time of such determination, we see no good reason for disturbing the order made by him. The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The chief judge, before whom this case was tried, and to whom the requests to find should therefore have been properly submitted, having, upon all the papers presented upon this appeal, determined that the defendant’s requests objected to were not properly presented to him, and all the facts being within his knowledge at the time of such determination, we see no good reason for disturbing the order made by him. The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.Y.S. 956, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooney-v-new-york-el-r-co-nyctcompl-1890.