Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.

8 N.Y.S. 956, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided January 15, 1890·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The chief judge, before whom this case was tried, and to whom the requests to find should therefore have been properly submitted, having, upon all the papers presented upon this appeal, determined that the defendant’s requests objected to were not properly presented to him, and all the facts being within his knowledge at the time of such determination, we see no good reason for disturbing the order made by him. The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The chief judge, before whom this case was tried, and to whom the requests to find should therefore have been properly submitted, having, upon all the papers presented upon this appeal, determined that the defendant’s requests objected to were not properly presented to him, and all the facts being within his knowledge at the time of such determination, we see no good reason for disturbing the order made by him. The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Mooney v. New York El. R. Co., 8 N.Y.S. 956, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1001, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1917 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

8 N.Y.S. 956 (Mooney v. New York El. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.