Mooney v. Florida Parole Commission

98 So. 3d 728, 2012 WL 4761499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17128
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 8, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-0107
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 3d 728 (Mooney v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mooney v. Florida Parole Commission, 98 So. 3d 728, 2012 WL 4761499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17128 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Benny Mooney petitions for certiorari review of an order of the circuit court which denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We grant the writ.

The circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied Mooney’s petition without affording him the opportunity to reply to the Florida Parole Commission’s response, which sought to dismiss the petition on the basis of res judicata. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED, the order denying Mooney’s petition is QUASHED, and this matter is REMANDED to the lower tribunal to afford Mooney the opportunity to reply to the response, and for reconsideration of this petition on the basis of the reply.

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bard v. Wolson
687 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 3d 728, 2012 WL 4761499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooney-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2012.