Mooney v. Corcoran
This text of 15 La. 46 (Mooney v. Corcoran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case turns altogether on questions of fact. The plaintiff sued to recover back a sum of three hundred and twenty dollars, which he had paid under a judgment rendered against him by the District Court, and which was afterwards reversed on appeal. The defendant’s plea that there was a compromise by which the plaintiff obtained a release of that much of the judgment, and that, in fact, he did not pay the whole amount, appears to us as it did to the court below, not sustained by the evidence.
The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooney-v-corcoran-la-1840.