Mooney v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Bethpage Fire District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mooney v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Bethpage Fire District

79 A.D.3d 941, 912 N.Y.S.2d 885

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Bethpage Fire District dated September 10, 2008, which adopted the findings and recommendations of a hearing officer dated April 18, 2008, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct, and terminated his membership in the Bethpage Fire Department.

[942] Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, may not be set aside (see Matter of Loscuito v Scoppetta, 50 AD3d 905 [2008]; Matter of Morris v Calderone, 49 AD3d 741 [2008]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 AD3d 489 [2005]; Matter of Saccone v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist., 13 AD3d 460 [2004]). Further, under the circumstances presented, the penalty of termination of the petitioner’s membership in the Bethpage Fire Department did not constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law as it was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Gallagher v Jackson, 78 AD3d 833 [2d Dept 2010]; Matter of Kurot v East Rockaway Fire Dept., 61 AD3d 760 [2009]; Matter of Loscuito v Scoppetta, 50 AD3d 905 [2008]; Matter of Morris v Calderone, 49 AD3d 741 [2008]; Matter of Saccone v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist., 13 AD3d 460 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Bethpage Fire District dated September 10, 2008, which adopted the findings and recommendations of a hearing officer dated April 18, 2008, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct, and terminated his membership in the Bethpage Fire Department.

[942] Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, may not be set aside (see Matter of Loscuito v Scoppetta, 50 AD3d 905 [2008]; Matter of Morris v Calderone, 49 AD3d 741 [2008]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 AD3d 489 [2005]; Matter of Saccone v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist., 13 AD3d 460 [2004]). Further, under the circumstances presented, the penalty of termination of the petitioner’s membership in the Bethpage Fire Department did not constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law as it was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Gallagher v Jackson, 78 AD3d 833 [2d Dept 2010]; Matter of Kurot v East Rockaway Fire Dept., 61 AD3d 760 [2009]; Matter of Loscuito v Scoppetta, 50 AD3d 905 [2008]; Matter of Morris v Calderone, 49 AD3d 741 [2008]; Matter of Saccone v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist., 13 AD3d 460 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Mooney v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Bethpage Fire District, 79 A.D.3d 941, 912 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

79 A.D.3d 941 (Mooney v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Bethpage Fire District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related