Mooney Construction Co. v. State

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 116, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 4, 1982
DocketNo. 77-CC-1219
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 116 (Mooney Construction Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mooney Construction Co. v. State, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 116, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1982).

Opinion

Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court upon motion of Claimant for default judgment.

This has been a case of many continuances and of long duration. Respondent has not filed any objection to Claimant’s motion for default judgment.

At the time of oral argument in this matter, Respondent objected to the entry of a default order. Respondent stated at that time that the facts in the case have been made of record and there was sufficient evidence in the record for the Court to make a decision on the merits of the claim.

The Court has reviewed the abstract of record, brief and argument of Claimant, oral arguments made by both parties, and is of the opinion that the motion for default order should be granted.

An award is hereby entered in favor of Claimant in the amount of $8,839.26.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gendel v. State
38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 76 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1984)
Noltemeier v. State
38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 107 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 116, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooney-construction-co-v-state-ilclaimsct-1982.