Moone v. Smith
This text of 67 S.E. 836 (Moone v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court erred in granting a nonsuit. Moone v. Smith, 6 Ga. App. 649 (65 S. E. 712), and eit.
2. The fact that the plaintiff was himself at the time of his injury engaged in an act violative of the penal laws of this State (in this case, gaming) does not preclude his recovery for damage resulting to him from the negligence of another, provided that his unlawful act did not proximately contribute to bringing about his injury. 29 Cyc. 125; Johnson v. Rome Ry. & Light Co., 4 Ca. App. 742, 745 (62 S. E. 491) ; Norris v. Litchfield, 35 N. H. 271 (69 Am. D. 546).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 836, 7 Ga. App. 675, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moone-v-smith-gactapp-1910.