Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store

S.D. New York

Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store

DecidedJanuary 31, 2023

Docket1:21-cv-10315

StatusUnknown

This text of Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store (Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K -------------------------------------------------------------- X : MOONBUG ENTERTAINMENT LTD., et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 21 Civ. 10315 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER ALL NIGHT REVELRY STORE, et al., : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------X

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, a Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order, issued June 2, 2022, granted Plaintiffs a default judgment against Defendants. Plaintiffs’ request for damages was then referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for a post-default-judgment inquest. WHEREAS, on January 6, 2023, Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) recommending that Plaintiff be awarded $1,250,000 in statutory damages, plus post- judgment interest. WHEREAS, the Report set a deadline for any objections fourteen days from service of the Report. WHEREAS, on January 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service on ECF, indicating that the Report had been served on Defendant on January 6, 2023. WHEREAS, no objections were timely filed. WHEREAS, in reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district judge is required to “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to” by any party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); accord United States v. Romano, 794 F.3d 317, 340 (2d Cir. 2015). WHEREAS, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record as to Judge Cott’s recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that the Report is ADOPTED in full. Plaintiffs are awarded $1,250,000 in damages, plus post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). Dated: January 31, 2023 New York, New York /

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K -------------------------------------------------------------- X : MOONBUG ENTERTAINMENT LTD., et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 21 Civ. 10315 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER ALL NIGHT REVELRY STORE, et al., : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------X

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, a Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order, issued June 2, 2022, granted Plaintiffs a default judgment against Defendants. Plaintiffs’ request for damages was then referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for a post-default-judgment inquest. WHEREAS, on January 6, 2023, Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) recommending that Plaintiff be awarded $1,250,000 in statutory damages, plus post- judgment interest. WHEREAS, the Report set a deadline for any objections fourteen days from service of the Report. WHEREAS, on January 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed an affidavit of service on ECF, indicating that the Report had been served on Defendant on January 6, 2023. WHEREAS, no objections were timely filed. WHEREAS, in reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district judge is required to “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to” by any party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); accord United States v. Romano, 794 F.3d 317, 340 (2d Cir. 2015). WHEREAS, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record as to Judge Cott’s recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that the Report is ADOPTED in full. Plaintiffs are awarded $1,250,000 in damages, plus post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). Dated: January 31, 2023 New York, New York /

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. All Night Revelry Store, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moonbug-entertainment-limited-v-all-night-revelry-store-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack