Moon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Moon v. State

1912 OK CR 282, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 712, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 121

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 3, 1912

DocketNos. A-1040, 1041.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 282 (Moon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moon v. State, 1912 OK CR 282, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 712, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 121 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

In each of the above mentioned causes the appellant was convicted in the county court of Bryan county, Oklahoma, for violations of the prohibitory law. On the 12th day of November, 1910, judgment was rendered 'against appellant in cause No. 1040 and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail, but appellant did not perfect his appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court until the 20th day of March, 1911. In cause No. 1041 judgment was rendered against *713 appellant on tlie 12th day of November, 1910, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail, but appellant did not perfect his appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court until the 20th day of March, 1911. More than one hundred ad twenty days having elapsed in both eases, from date of judgemnt, before the appeal was perfected, this court did not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal in either case. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

ABMSTBONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, P. J.

In each of the above mentioned causes the appellant was convicted in the county court of Bryan county, Oklahoma, for violations of the prohibitory law. On the 12th day of November, 1910, judgment was rendered 'against appellant in cause No. 1040 and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail, but appellant did not perfect his appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court until the 20th day of March, 1911. In cause No. 1041 judgment was rendered against *713 appellant on tlie 12th day of November, 1910, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail, but appellant did not perfect his appeal by filing a transcript of the record in this court until the 20th day of March, 1911. More than one hundred ad twenty days having elapsed in both eases, from date of judgemnt, before the appeal was perfected, this court did not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal in either case. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

ABMSTBONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 282, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 712, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.