Moon v. Sissen

• Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
• Decided: January 14, 2025
• Docket: 2:24-cv-12850
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID MOON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-12850

v. Honorable Susan K. DeClercq United States District Judge SISSEN et al., Honorable Kimberly G. Altman Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge ___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 18), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS (ECF Nos. 10; 11; 12) AND FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15)

On December 16, 2024, Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman issued a report recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s three motions for preliminary injunctions and one motion for declaratory judgment. ECF No. 18; see also ECF Nos. 10; 11; 12; 15. Judge Altman provided 14 days to object, but Plaintiff did not do so. Plaintiff has therefore forfeited her right to appeal Judge Altman’s findings.1 See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report.

1 Plaintiff indicates in her complaint that her chosen name is Azelie Delaina Moon and her preferred pronouns are she/her. (ECF No. 1, PageID.4). The Court therefore will use she/her when referring to Plaintiff. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 18, is ADOPTED.

Consequently, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 10, is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 11, is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 12, is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Declaratory Judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED. This is not a final order and does not close the above-captioned case.

/s/Susan K. DeClercq SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ United States District Judge Dated: January 14, 2025