Moon v. Moon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moon v. Moon

12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6647

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 591 (Moon v. Moon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moon v. Moon, 12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September 29, 1960, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees in an action for annulment unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, with $20 costs and disbursements of the appeal to abide the event. On the present record there is an insufficient showing of probability of success on the cause of action seeking an annulment. Moreover, plaintiff wife has sufficient means and income of her own and she has not shown a substantial change in her circumstances as a result of the marriage to her financial detriment. In view of these facts plaintiff wife has not shown the necessity for either temporary alimony or counsel fees. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court decided herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September 29, 1960, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees in an action for annulment unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, with $20 costs and disbursements of the appeal to abide the event. On the present record there is an insufficient showing of probability of success on the cause of action seeking an annulment. Moreover, plaintiff wife has sufficient means and income of her own and she has not shown a substantial change in her circumstances as a result of the marriage to her financial detriment. In view of these facts plaintiff wife has not shown the necessity for either temporary alimony or counsel fees. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court decided herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 591, 208 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-moon-nyappdiv-1960.