Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Moon v. Moon

Moon v. Moon

524 S.E.2d 219, 271 Ga. 685, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 964
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1999
DocketS99A0758
StatusPublished

This text of 524 S.E.2d 219 (Moon v. Moon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moon v. Moon, 524 S.E.2d 219, 271 Ga. 685, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 964 (Ga. 1999).

Opinion

Carley, Justice,

dissenting.

Because the record clearly shows that parental fitness was not a contested issue below, this case is ripe for decision. I therefore dissent to the majority’s remand for the purpose of addressing the previously unchallenged issue of parental fitness.

[686]*686Decided November 15, 1999. Howard G. Sokol, Vicky O. Kimbrell, Phyllis J. Holmen, Lisa J. Krisher, for appellant. Martin L. Fierman, Alan W. Thrower, Kutner & Bloom, Jean M. Kutner, for appellees. David A. Webster, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Lynn M. Adam, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ShalenA. Sgrosso, Assistant Attorney General, amici curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 S.E.2d 219, 271 Ga. 685, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-moon-ga-1999.