Home/Supreme Court/Moon v. Jones

Moon v. Jones

309 U.S. 640, 60 S. Ct. 894
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 22, 1940·No. No. 838; No. 862·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Bell’s Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 [641]*641U. S. 232, 237; Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132, 138-139; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 513-514.

Messrs. Seth T. Cole, Martin Saxe, Edward F. Colladay, and S. F. Colladay for appellant in No. 838. Messrs. James A. Davis and Leon Quat for appellant in No. 862. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Henry E-pstein, Solicitor General, and Jack Goodman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moon v. Jones, 309 U.S. 640, 60 S. Ct. 894 (1940).

309 U.S. 640 (Moon v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania
134 U.S. 232 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Wisconsin
247 U.S. 132 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Alward v. Johnson
282 U.S. 509 (Supreme Court, 1931)