Home/Supreme Court/Moon v. Jones

Moon v. Jones

309 U.S. 640, 60 S. Ct. 894
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 22, 1940
DocketNo. 838; No. 862
StatusPublished

This text of 309 U.S. 640 (Moon v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moon v. Jones, 309 U.S. 640, 60 S. Ct. 894 (1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Bell’s Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 [641]*641U. S. 232, 237; Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132, 138-139; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 513-514.

Messrs. Seth T. Cole, Martin Saxe, Edward F. Colladay, and S. F. Colladay for appellant in No. 838. Messrs. James A. Davis and Leon Quat for appellant in No. 862. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Henry E-pstein, Solicitor General, and Jack Goodman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania
134 U.S. 232 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Wisconsin
247 U.S. 132 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Alward v. Johnson
282 U.S. 509 (Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 U.S. 640, 60 S. Ct. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-jones-scotus-1940.