Moon v. Hadley
This text of 444 So. 2d 1158 (Moon v. Hadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert E. Moon has filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate a default.
The trial court’s decision must stand unless Moon has shown excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. As Moon has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the trial court, the order denying the motion is affirmed. L.B.T. Corp. v. Camacho, 429 So.2d 88 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Abel, Tony & Aldo Creative Group, Inc. v. Friday Night Investors, Inc., 419 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Claffey v. Serafino, 338 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Benedict v. W.T. Hadlow Co., 52 Fla. 188, 42 So. 239 (1906).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 1158, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-hadley-fladistctapp-1984.