Moon Motor Car Co. v. Cent. Storg. & Ware. Co.
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76
This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76 (Moon Motor Car Co. v. Cent. Storg. & Ware. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moon Motor Car Co. v. Cent. Storg. & Ware. Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76 (Ohio 1927).
Opinion
The Moon Motor Co. contends in the Supreme Court that a warehouseman is liable when car is damaged by water freezing in the cooling system in spite of the facts that said warehouseman was protected by a clause in the receipt as to frozen batteries and that evidence was introduced to show that it was not the custom of the trade to take precautions against freezing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-motor-car-co-v-cent-storg-ware-co-ohio-1927.