Moon Carriage Co. v. Waxahachie Grain Co.

35 S.W. 1047, 89 Tex. 511, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 393
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 14, 1896
DocketApplication No. 1064.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 S.W. 1047 (Moon Carriage Co. v. Waxahachie Grain Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moon Carriage Co. v. Waxahachie Grain Co., 35 S.W. 1047, 89 Tex. 511, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 393 (Tex. 1896).

Opinion

In the case of the Orr and Lindsay Shoe Company against R.H. Thompson, recently decided, we held that, after a corporation becomes insolvent and ceases to carry on its business, creditors cannot acquire a preference lien upon the assets by attachment or other judicial process. There are expressions in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in the present case which conflict with this view. But we are of opinion that the case was correctly decided and therefore the writ of error must be refused. The corporation in question in this case, though insolvent when the attachment issued, had not ceased to carry on its business in the usual course of trade; and, in our opinion, the point had not then been reached when the property of the corporation could be deemed a trust fund for the benefit of all its creditors alike.

The application for the writ of error is refused.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zorn v. Brooks
83 S.W.2d 949 (Texas Supreme Court, 1935)
General Electric Co. v. Canton City Ice & Light Co.
136 S.W. 78 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.W. 1047, 89 Tex. 511, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-carriage-co-v-waxahachie-grain-co-tex-1896.