Moolenaar v. Fischer

67 A.D.3d 1296, 888 N.Y.S.2d 807
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 25, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 A.D.3d 1296 (Moolenaar v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moolenaar v. Fischer, 67 A.D.3d 1296, 888 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, suspected of marihuana use, was required to submit a urine sample, which twice tested positive for cannabinoids. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of using a controlled substance. After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis tests and the testimony of the correction officer who collected the urine sample and performed the tests provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1180 [2009]; Matter of Smith v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2008]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the chain of custody was properly established as the officer who performed the tests had the sample in his possession at all times (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e] [1] [i]; Matter of McAdoo v Goord, 32 [1297]*1297AD3d 1058, 1058-1059 [2006]; Matter of Odome v Goord, 14 AD3d 975, 975-976 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Prack
107 A.D.3d 1250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A.D.3d 1296, 888 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moolenaar-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2009.