Moody v. Warren-Robbins, Inc.
This text of 110 S.E.2d 866 (Moody v. Warren-Robbins, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause was properly instituted in Wilkes County. G.S. 1-76. This did not, however, prevent plaintiff from seeking a removal for the convenience of witnesses. Pushman v. Dameron, 208 N.C. 336, 180 S.E. 578. Whether the motion to remove should be granted was a matter in the discretion of the court.
The record presented to us does not ©how defendants, as here argued, were denied an opportunity to present evidence in opposition to the motion. It does not show a request to continue the hearing with opportunity to present evidence. The order was based on the evidence taken at the trial.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.E.2d 866, 251 N.C. 172, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-warren-robbins-inc-nc-1959.