Moody v. Warren-Robbins, Inc.

110 S.E.2d 866, 251 N.C. 172, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 538
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 4, 1959·Published

Opinion

Pee OuRiam.

The cause was properly instituted in Wilkes County. G.S. 1-76. This did not, however, prevent plaintiff from seeking a removal for the convenience of witnesses. Pushman v. Dameron, 208 N.C. 336, 180 S.E. 578. Whether the motion to remove should be granted was a matter in the discretion of the court.

The record presented to us does not ©how defendants, as here argued, were denied an opportunity to present evidence in opposition to the motion. It does not show a request to continue the hearing with opportunity to present evidence. The order was based on the evidence taken at the trial.

Affirmed.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. Warren-Robbins, Inc., 110 S.E.2d 866, 251 N.C. 172, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 538 (N.C. 1959).

110 S.E.2d 866 (Moody v. Warren-Robbins, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pushman v. . Dameron
180 S.E. 578 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)