Moody v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Moody v. State

240 S.W.2d 311, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2022

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moody v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 Tex. Crim. 207 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 1951·No. No. 25324·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Upon his plea of “guilty” before the court, a jury having been waived, appellant was found guilty of the offense of driving while intoxicated. This being the second offense, his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without either a statement of facts or bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular. No question being presented for review, the judgment is affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Upon his plea of “guilty” before the court, a jury having been waived, appellant was found guilty of the offense of driving while intoxicated. This being the second offense, his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without either a statement of facts or bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular. No question being presented for review, the judgment is affirmed

Moody v. State, 240 S.W.2d 311, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2022 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

240 S.W.2d 311 (Moody v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.