Moody v. State

290 S.W. 161, 106 Tex. Crim. 55, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 657
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 1926
DocketNo. 10500.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 S.W. 161 (Moody v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moody v. State, 290 S.W. 161, 106 Tex. Crim. 55, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 657 (Tex. 1926).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of fifteen years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. We find several bills of exceptions which bear upon the rulings of the court in receiving certain evidence. The relation of the matters to which the bills advert cannot be ascertained from the bills nor appraised in the absence of a statement of the facts.

There is complaint of certain special charges, the applicability of which we are unable to determine in the absence of the facts which were before the court at the time the charges were given to the jury. The same may be said of the complaint made of the argument of the prosecuting attorney.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCormick v. State
329 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Levassar v. State
47 S.W.2d 841 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 S.W. 161, 106 Tex. Crim. 55, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.