Moody v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Moody v. State

159 S.E. 877, 43 Ga. App. 783, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 556

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moody v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Ga. App. 1 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 4, 1931·No. 21642·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the indictment was without merit and was properly overruled.

2. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (complaining of several excerpts from the charge, and of the failure to charge certain contentions of the defendant which were alleged to be supported by the evidence) show no harmful error.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloockoorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the indictment was without merit and was properly overruled.

2. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (complaining of several excerpts from the charge, and of the failure to charge certain contentions of the defendant which were alleged to be supported by the evidence) show no harmful error.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloockoorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Moody v. State, 159 S.E. 877, 43 Ga. App. 783, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

159 S.E. 877 (Moody v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.