Moody v. State

40 S.E. 242, 114 Ga. 449, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 740
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 19, 1901·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. This case, as to the first point ruled above, is directly within the principle laid down in Fletcher v. State, 85 Ga. 666.

2. The charge dealt within the second headnote was obviously erroneous. Whether or not given circumstances are entitled to any weight is purely a matter for the jury. ' As the judge instructed the jury that they must give weight to certain circumstances, and as the same tended to show the guilt of the accused, the charge was in this respect necessarily prejudicial to him.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. State, 40 S.E. 242, 114 Ga. 449, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 740 (Ga. 1901).

40 S.E. 242 (Moody v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyt v. State
649 S.E.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Watson v. State
182 S.E.2d 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Parham v. State
171 S.E.2d 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Hogan v. State
142 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Kitchens v. State
76 S.E.2d 618 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Hornbuckle v. State
45 S.E.2d 98 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Martin v. State
185 S.E. 387 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Staton v. State
163 S.E. 901 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Mosley v. State
140 S.E. 754 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Holliday v. State
98 S.E. 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Paulk v. State
70 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Hobbs v. State
68 S.E. 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Ransom v. State
59 S.E. 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Blumenthal v. State
49 S.E. 597 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Baldwin v. State
47 S.E. 558 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)