Moody v. State
54 Ga. 660
Opinion
.The opinion of the court is given at sufficient length in the head-notes. As the conviction was eminently right and proper, the error of the judge in charging on the constitution, as indicated in the sixth head-note, had no hurtful consequence.
■We are satisfied to let the verdict stand ; and the judgment refusing a new trial is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moody v. State, 54 Ga. 660 (Ga. 1875).
54 Ga. 660 (Moody v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Golden v. State
47 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Harris v. State
45 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Watson v. State
43 S.E. 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Kendrick v. State
39 S.E. 286 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Baker v. State
36 S.E. 607 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Charlon v. State
32 S.E. 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Walton v. State
5 S.E. 203 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Turner v. State
70 Ga. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)