Moody v. State

717 So. 2d 627, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12281, 1998 WL 653605
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moody v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 679 So. 2d 23
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1998·No. No. 97-2927·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions are affirmed. See Chambers v. State, 692 So.2d 210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); McClain v. State, 383 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1980). It was error to assess 18 points on the defendant’s scoresheet for possession of a firearm. See Fisher v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S422, 718 So.2d 753 (Fla.1998); White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998). The sentences imposed are within the 25% deviation permitted under the guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18). Nevertheless, we reverse and remand for resentencing so as to allow the trial court, at its discretion, the opportunity to revise its sentence.

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE REVERSED AND CAUSE REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. State, 717 So. 2d 627, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12281, 1998 WL 653605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 627 (Moody v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClain v. State
383 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
White v. State
714 So. 2d 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Chambers v. State
692 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Fisher v. State
718 So. 2d 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)