Moody v. Smith
70 N.Y. 598
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Rapallo, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moody v. Smith, 70 N.Y. 598 (N.Y. 1877).
70 N.Y. 598 (Moody v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marshall v. Lowd
147 A.2d 667 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1958)
Diamond v. Diamond
200 Misc. 1055 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Carkonen v. Alberts
83 P.2d 899 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)
Deal v. . Wilson
101 S.E. 205 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Eastman v. Dunn
83 A. 1057 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1912)
Jacobson v. Hendricks
75 A. 85 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1910)
Bowman v. Wade
103 P. 72 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)
Appelbaum v. Galewski
34 Misc. 281 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
Baumann v. . Pinckney
23 N.E. 916 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Roehl v. Haumesser
15 N.E. 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)
Gerhardt v. Amman
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 104 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)
Allen v. Richard
83 Mo. 55 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Parsons v. Hayes
14 Abb. N. Cas. 419 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1883)