Moody v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Moody v. Rogers

85 S.W. 84, 74 Ark. 132, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 413

DecidedFebruary 4, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.W. 84 (Moody v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moody v. Rogers, 85 S.W. 84, 74 Ark. 132, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 413 (Ark. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) It does not appear that the writ was for the purpose of enforcing any order or judgment of the court. The proceedings therefore as to notice are controlled by section 4481 of Kirby’s Digest, which requires ten days’ notice after filing the petition before the motion for mandamus is made. See Kirby’s Digest, § 5158.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) It does not appear that the writ was for the purpose of enforcing any order or judgment of the court. The proceedings therefore as to notice are controlled by section 4481 of Kirby’s Digest, which requires ten days’ notice after filing the petition before the motion for mandamus is made. See Kirby’s Digest, § 5158.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.W. 84, 74 Ark. 132, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-rogers-ark-1905.