Moody v. Nelson

60 Ill. 229
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 60 Ill. 229 (Moody v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moody v. Nelson, 60 Ill. 229 (Ill. 1871).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This is a writ of error to the Kane county circuit court, to bring up for review a judgment entered in that court upon the award of arbitrators.

The 1st section of the statute, under which this proceeding was had, is as follows: “All persons having the requisite legal capacity may, by an instrument in writing, to be signed and sealed by them, and attested by at least one witness, submit to one or more arbitrators any controversy existing between them, not in suit; and may, in such submission, agree that a judgment of any court of record, competent to hare jurisdiction of the subject matter, to be named in sucb instrument, shall be rendered upon the award made pursuant to such submission.” Gross’ Stat. 51.

The submission under which the award was made, is not in conformity with the statute. It was not attested by any witness, nor does it contain any agreement that a judgment shall be rendered upon the award made pursuant to such submission. All that it contains on that subject is this: “And it is hereby further agreed and understood, by and between the said parties, that this submission shall be made a rule of the circuit court within and for the county of Kane aforesaid.”

This is not equivalent to an agreement that a judgment shall be rendered upon the. award made pursuant to the submission. A submission executed with the formalities, and containing, in substance, what is required by the statute, was indispensable to the jurisdiction of the circuit court to render the judgment. Low et al. v. Nolte, 15 Ill. 368.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed.

Judgment reversedi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West Chicago Park Commissioners v. Riddle
151 Ill. App. 487 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1909)
Gessner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
108 N.W. 986 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)
Duffy v. Odell
117 Ill. App. 336 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
Burkland v. Johnson
70 N.W. 388 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Chickering-Chase Brothers Co. v. De Voll
55 Ill. App. 442 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Ill. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-nelson-ill-1871.