Moody v. Moody

15 Me. 205
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedApril 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Me. 205 (Moody v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moody v. Moody, 15 Me. 205 (Me. 1839).

Opinion

The case was continued for advisement, and the opinion of the Court afterwards drawn up by

WestoN C. J.

The first sale, made by the administrator, not being warranted by law, and having for that reason been declared void, cannot affect the rights of the parties. The real estate of an intestate descends to his heirs, subject to the contingency of being taken from them, if wanted to pay the debts of the deceased. Until thus taken, the heirs have a right to enjoy the inheritance and are entitled for its protection to all the remedies, which the law affords to a tenant. No trespasser, or other wrongdoer, can defend himself against their suit, or the suit of either of them, upon the ground that the land will probably, or even inevitably, be wanted to satisfy the just claims of creditors. The title of the heirs is good, until defeated by due operation of law ; and we are therefore of opinion, that the point taken by the defendant cannot avail him.

Judgment on the verdict for treble damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foisy v. Bishop
232 A.2d 797 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Me. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-moody-me-1839.