Moody v. Moody
This text of 244 S.E.2d 875 (Moody v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant filed suit in equity to set aside a deed by which his mother conveyed certain real estate to his brother, alleging fraud, inadequacy of consideration, and nondelivery. This appeal is from the judgment entered on a jury verdict for appellee.
1. Appellant’s first three enumerations of error are without merit. The fact that a deed is not recorded, and may not be recordable for lack of attestation does not render it invalid, nor inadmissible in evidence if the proper foundation is laid. Allgood v. Allgood, 230 Ga. 312, 313 (196 SE2d 888) (1973).
2. There was no error in failing to give the requested charge, since the court charged the applicable principle in its own words.
3. Appellant cannot complain of the failure to give charges without request, since the failures complained of *287 are not substantial or harmful as a matter of law. Code § 70-207 (a, c); McGarr v. McGarr, 239 Ga. 640 (1) (238 SE2d 427)(1977).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 S.E.2d 875, 241 Ga. 286, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-moody-ga-1978.