Moody v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.

76 S.E. 857, 139 Ga. 102, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 11, 1912·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

It appearing from the petition in this case1 and the bill of exceptions filed by the plaintiff in error to the refusal of an interlocutory injunction that a judgment refusing injunctive relief alone is complained of, and it further appearing that no supersedeas was granted' upon the refusal of injunction in the court below, and that the acts against which an injunction was sought have been performed and completed, which facts have been made duly to appear to this court, the writ of error will be dismissed. Henderson v. Hoppe, 103 Ga. 686 (30 S. E. 653); Bond v. Long, 133 Ga. 639 (66 S. E. 778); Southern Cement Stone Co. v. Logan Coal & Supply Co., 136 Ga. 473 (71 S. E. 915).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 76 S.E. 857, 139 Ga. 102, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 545 (Ga. 1912).

76 S.E. 857 (Moody v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Smith
178 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Fountain v. Grant
84 S.E.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Bush v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
19 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Carlton v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway
77 S.E. 1128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Stribbling v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.
78 S.E. 42 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)