Moody v. First Nat. Bank of Aransas Pass.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Moody v. First Nat. Bank of Aransas Pass.

198 S.W. 169, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 905

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 24, 1917

DocketNo. 5891.

StatusPublished

This text of 198 S.W. 169 (Moody v. First Nat. Bank of Aransas Pass.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moody v. First Nat. Bank of Aransas Pass., 198 S.W. 169, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 905 (Tex. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

MOURSUND, J.

Appellee sued appellant in justice’s court for $100, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from March 20, 1916, alleging in substance that it had parted with $100 to defendant’s son by reason of a certain false representation made by defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and upon appeal to the county court judgmlent was again rendered in favor of, plaintiff for $100 with interest thereon as prayed for. The defendant appealed, and presents a number of assignments of error in his brief, attacking the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed by the trial court, but such assignments of error do not appear in the transcript, and therefore cannot be considered. Peacock v. Moore, 125 S. W. 943; English v. Allen, 173 S. W. 1172.

No fundamental error appearing, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOURSUND, J.

Appellee sued appellant in justice’s court for $100, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from March 20, 1916, alleging in substance that it had parted with $100 to defendant’s son by reason of a certain false representation made by defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and upon appeal to the county court judgmlent was again rendered in favor of, plaintiff for $100 with interest thereon as prayed for. The defendant appealed, and presents a number of assignments of error in his brief, attacking the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed by the trial court, but such assignments of error do not appear in the transcript, and therefore cannot be considered. Peacock v. Moore, 125 S. W. 943; English v. Allen, 173 S. W. 1172.

No fundamental error appearing, the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 S.W. 169, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moody-v-first-nat-bank-of-aransas-pass-texapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack