Moody v. DuBois Bros.

116 S.E. 219, 29 Ga. App. 652, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 151
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 16, 1923·No. 13519·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Beix, J.

This was an action by an infant by next friend against the owner of a truck, for injuries alleged to have been caused February 28, 1921, by reason of the negligence of the driver. The verdict was in favor of defendant. Even though the evidence was such as to show that the truck at the time was being driven at an intersection .of public streets at a speed in excess of six miles per hour, in violation of the statute, and therefore amounting to negligence per se, there was some evidence from which the jury could have legitimately inferred that such negligence was not the proximate cause of the injury (Schofield v. Hatfield, 25 Ga. App. 513, 103 S. E. 732); and, no error in the trial appearing, the court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the-motion of the plaintiff for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Blephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. DuBois Bros., 116 S.E. 219, 29 Ga. App. 652, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

116 S.E. 219 (Moody v. DuBois Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. Daniel
167 S.E. 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Faggart v. Rowe
126 S.E. 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Elberton & Eastern Railroad v. Thornton
122 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Martin v. McAfee & Co.
122 S.E. 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Davis v. Whitcomb
118 S.E. 488 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)