Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

80 A.2d 734, 367 Pa. 493, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 413

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 21, 1951

DocketAppeal, 138

StatusPublished

Cited by45 cases

This text of 80 A.2d 734 (Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 80 A.2d 734, 367 Pa. 493, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 413 (Pa. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

■' The question of the defendant’s negligence is indeed a close one. But, a majority of the members of the court who heard the argument of this appeal are of the opinion that the case could not properly have been taken from the jury. Consequently, the learned court below was correct in refusing the defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. The judgment for the plaintiff is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Guerin for the court en banc.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

■' The question of the defendant’s negligence is indeed a close one. But, a majority of the members of the court who heard the argument of this appeal are of the opinion that the case could not properly have been taken from the jury. Consequently, the learned court below was correct in refusing the defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. The judgment for the plaintiff is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Guerin for the court en banc.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.2d 734, 367 Pa. 493, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moodie-v-westinghouse-electric-corp-pa-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack