Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne

3 U.S. 319
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided August 15, 1796·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Elsworth, Chief' JuJlice.

Suggeftions of policy and conveniency cannot be confidered in the judicial determination óf a queftion of right-.: the Treaty with France, whatever that is,' muft have its effe¿L By the 19th artidle, it is declared, that French veflcls, whether public and of war, or private and of merchants, may, on any urgent, neceffity, enter our ports, and be fupplied with'all things needful for repairs. In' the prefent'cafe, the privateer only underwent a repair; and the mere- re-placement of her force cannot tie a- material augmentation; even if an augmentation of force could be deemed (which we do not decide) a fufficient caufe for reftitution.

By the Court : Let the decree, of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne, 3 U.S. 319 (1796).

3 U.S. 319 (Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moodie v. Ship Phoebe Anne
3 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1796)