Mony Life Insurance v. Cordero

22 A.D.3d 815, 802 N.Y.S.2d 632
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain insurance policies are void ab initio, the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated October 22, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the third-party complaint is dismissed.

The third-party defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that his alleged breach of a fiduciary duty did not proximately cause any of the third-party plaintiff’s alleged damages (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Rodriguez v Investors Ins. Co. of Am., 201 AD2d 355, 356 [1994]). In opposition, the third-party plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mony Life Insurance v. Cordero, 22 A.D.3d 815, 802 N.Y.S.2d 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

22 A.D.3d 815 (Mony Life Insurance v. Cordero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee
51 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)