Monumental Investment Corp. v. Ziadeh

Fourth Circuit

Monumental Investment Corp. v. Ziadeh

176 F. App'x 376

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 2006

DocketNo. 05-1775

StatusPublished

This text of 176 F. App'x 376 (Monumental Investment Corp. v. Ziadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monumental Investment Corp. v. Ziadeh, 176 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Affidavit and Complaint.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Monu[377]*377mental Inv. Corp. v. Bell Constr. Co., No. CA-96-936 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Affidavit and Complaint.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Monu[377]*377mental Inv. Corp. v. Bell Constr. Co., No. CA-96-936 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 F. App'x 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monumental-investment-corp-v-ziadeh-ca4-2006.