Home/Ninth Circuit/Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.

Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.

623 F.3d 912, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20196, 2010 WL 3896204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 649 F.3d 975 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 08-56954·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., 623 F.3d 912, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20196, 2010 WL 3896204 (9th Cir. 2010).

623 F.3d 912 (Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Flores-Blanco
623 F.3d 912 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)