Monty E. Hamlor v. L. W. Huffman Lonnie M. Saunders Jack Lee F. S. Taylor Robert J. Byrd D. I. Cook

Fourth Circuit

Monty E. Hamlor v. L. W. Huffman Lonnie M. Saunders Jack Lee F. S. Taylor Robert J. Byrd D. I. Cook

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848, 1995 WL 29053

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 1995

Docket94-6976

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (Monty E. Hamlor v. L. W. Huffman Lonnie M. Saunders Jack Lee F. S. Taylor Robert J. Byrd D. I. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monty E. Hamlor v. L. W. Huffman Lonnie M. Saunders Jack Lee F. S. Taylor Robert J. Byrd D. I. Cook, 45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848, 1995 WL 29053 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Monty E. HAMLOR, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
L. W. HUFFMAN; Lonnie M. Saunders; Jack Lee; F. S.
Taylor; Robert J. Byrd; D. I. Cook, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-6976.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 10, 1995.
Decided: January 26, 1995.

Monty E. Hamlor, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hamlor v. Huffman, No. CA-93-704 (W.D.Va. Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Monty E. HAMLOR, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
L. W. HUFFMAN; Lonnie M. Saunders; Jack Lee; F. S.
Taylor; Robert J. Byrd; D. I. Cook, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-6976.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 10, 1995.
Decided: January 26, 1995.

Monty E. Hamlor, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hamlor v. Huffman, No. CA-93-704 (W.D.Va. Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848, 1995 WL 29053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monty-e-hamlor-v-l-w-huffman-lonnie-m-saunders-jac-ca4-1995.