Monts v. State
This text of 870 So. 2d 952 (Monts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.850, as untimely. In response to an order issued by this Court on the authority of Toler v. State, 493 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), the state conceded that Appellant’s motion was timely because it was filed within two years of the date the mandate issued from this Court. See, e.g., Brower v. State, 701 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further consideration of Appellant’s postconviction motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
870 So. 2d 952, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647, 2004 WL 875139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monts-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.