Montrose Ford, Inc. v. Starn

Ohio Supreme Court

Montrose Ford, Inc. v. Starn

765 N.E.2d 873, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 803

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 2, 2002

Docket02-335

StatusPublished

This text of 765 N.E.2d 873 (Montrose Ford, Inc. v. Starn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montrose Ford, Inc. v. Starn, 765 N.E.2d 873, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 803 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 20605. On March 27, 2002, appellee, Montrose Ford, Inc., filed a memorandum in response with the names of Jay E. Krasovec and Carl E. Patrick listed as counsel. Whereas Carl E. Patrick, who is registered for corporate status under Gov.Bar R. VI and is not admitted to the [1405]*1405practice of law in Ohio, has not complied with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(2) for admission pro hac vice,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Carl E. Patrick be and hereby is stricken from the memorandum in response and Carl E. Patrick shall not be permitted to appear in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 20605. On March 27, 2002, appellee, Montrose Ford, Inc., filed a memorandum in response with the names of Jay E. Krasovec and Carl E. Patrick listed as counsel. Whereas Carl E. Patrick, who is registered for corporate status under Gov.Bar R. VI and is not admitted to the [1405]*1405practice of law in Ohio, has not complied with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(2) for admission pro hac vice,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Carl E. Patrick be and hereby is stricken from the memorandum in response and Carl E. Patrick shall not be permitted to appear in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 N.E.2d 873, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montrose-ford-inc-v-starn-ohio-2002.