Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2023
Docket22-2192
StatusUnpublished

This text of Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne (Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne, (8th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2192 ___________________________

Montrell C. Holmes

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Lieutenant John Hawthorne, Probation and Parole Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual; Korey Kyles, Parole Officer, Individual; Sincerity Rutling, Supervisor, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Chris Sarchett, Superintendent, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Lieutenant Tasha Kupihea, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual; Sergeant Chelsea Dowell, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual; T. Green, Case Manager, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Keith Davis, Probation & Parole Officer, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Lieutenant Manning, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Lieutenant Summerville, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity; Sergeant William Griffin, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual; Ms. Jordan, Lieutenant, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Danielle Beiter, Correctional Officer, Individual; Ms. Dent, Probation & Parole, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; C. Highgrade, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity; Carrie Sederstrom, ERDCC, Probation & Parole Officer, Individual and Official Capacity; Kody Stanley, Corizon Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; Unknown Erwin, Sergeant, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity; Ian Boyd, Doctor, St. Louis University Hospital, Individual and Official Capacity; Jonathan S. Cade, Medical Doctor, St. Louis University Hospital, Individual and Official Capacity; Unknown Dalton, Correctional Officer, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity; Melissa Brown, Case Manager, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity; Unknown Davis, Correctional Officer, Individual and Official Capacity; Probation & Parole, MO D.O.C., Individual and Official Capacity; Transitional Center St. Louis; John Doe 2; John Doe 1; Johnny Holmes, Correctional Officer; Lieutenant Lambe, Transitional Center St. Louis, Individual and Official Capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: March 28, 2023 Filed: March 31, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Montrell Holmes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d). Upon careful review, we find no abuse of discretion in the dismissal. See Lopez v. Whirlpool Corp., 989 F.3d 656, 662 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review). Holmes knew about and chose not to attend the first deposition scheduled by defendants; and he failed to inform the court and the defendants of his updated address to ensure he received notice of the rescheduled deposition and the court’s orders, as required by the local rule. See E.D. Mo. L.R. 2.06(b) (pro se party shall promptly notify clerk and all other parties of any change in his address); Hairston v. Alert Safety Light Prods., Inc., 307 F.3d 717, 718-19 (8th Cir. 2002) (sanction of dismissal is appropriate when failure to comply has been due to willfulness or any fault of petitioner).

1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, now retired.

-2- The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellees’ motion to file a sur-reply. ______________________________

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Montrell Holmes v. Lieutenant John Hawthorne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montrell-holmes-v-lieutenant-john-hawthorne-ca8-2023.