Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 2017

Docket16-5756

StatusPublished

This text of Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida (Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MONTRE D. RICHARDSON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-5756

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed April 17, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Montre D. Richardson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI