Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 So. 3d 605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 2017·No. 16-5756·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MONTRE D. RICHARDSON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-5756

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed April 17, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Montre D. Richardson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida (Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.