Montoya v. State
143 So. 3d 952, 2014 WL 2740374, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211
This text of 143 So. 3d 952 (Montoya v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Montoya v. State, 143 So. 3d 952, 2014 WL 2740374, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167, 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Appellant’s argument that the trial court judge should have been disqualified from ruling on the [953]*953post-conviction motion was not raised below and thus was not preserved for appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Atwell v. State
128 So. 3d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 So. 3d 952, 2014 WL 2740374, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montoya-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.