Montoya-Chimal v. Care Heating

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 28, 2010
DocketI.C. NO. W53951.
StatusPublished

This text of Montoya-Chimal v. Care Heating (Montoya-Chimal v. Care Heating) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montoya-Chimal v. Care Heating, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as: *Page 2

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Commission and the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.

2. All parties have been correctly designated.

3. Defendant-employer was subject to the Act on the date of the injury in question.

4. On October 7, 2009, Ricardo Montoya-Doroteo (hereafter "decedent") sustained an admittedly compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer and which resulted in his death.

5. The average weekly wage of decedent was $468.58, which yields a compensation rate of $312.40.

6. An employee-employer relationship existed between decedent and defendant-employer at the time of the accident.

7. Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra was wholly dependent upon the earnings of decedent at the time of his death.

8. Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal was an acknowledged illegitimate child dependent upon the earnings of decedent at the time of his death.

9. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, the parties submitted a packet of various stipulated exhibits, which was admitted into the record and marked as Stipulated Exhibit (2) and which included the following:

a. Industrial Commission forms and filings;

b. Decedent's death certificate;

c. Birth certificate for Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal;

d. Payroll records;

*Page 3

e. The medical examiner's report;

f. A shipping statement from International Mortuary; and

g. Plaintiffs' discovery responses.

12. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiffs submitted the following:

a. A funeral home bill, which was admitted into the record and marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit (1); and

b. A paternity test results from LabCorp, which was admitted into the record and marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit (2).

13. After the filing of the Opinion and Award by Deputy Commissioner Houser, the parties stipulated to the admissibility of a judgment entered in File No. 10 CV 2463 in Davidson County District Court.

***********
ISSUES TO BE DETERMINED
Whether Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra is entitled to death benefits when she was not married to decedent at the time of his death, but lived with decedent and was dependent upon him for support for a significant period of time prior to his death.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission enters the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On October 7, 2009, decedent was employed by defendant-employer as a construction worker installing heating and air ducts. On that date, decedent accidently fell from *Page 4 the first floor living area through the open structure to the basement below. As a result of this fall, decedent sustained skull fractures, cervical fractures, and an intraparenchymal hemorrhage.

2. After being transported to Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, decedent's condition declined rapidly and he died from an acute intracranial injury with intraparenchymal hemorrhage, as confirmed by the medical examiner.

3. On October 7, 2009, decedent sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer that resulted in his death.

4. At the time of his death, decedent was unmarried and was survived by his minor daughter, Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal, born May 3, 2008. Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra is the natural mother of Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal.

5. From approximately 2005 until his death in 2009, decedent shared a residence with Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra. Decedent was never married to Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra.

6. In 2007, Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra became pregnant and subsequently gave birth to a daughter, Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal, on May 3, 2008.

7. Prior to his death, decedent publicly acknowledged Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal as his child and requested that his name be listed as her father on her birth certificate. Additionally, the results of a paternity test revealed a 99.99% probability that decedent was the biological father of Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal.

8. On September 10, 2010, in File No. 10 CV 2463, Davidson County District Court Judge Wayne L. Michael entered a Judgment establishing decedent's paternity of Katie Cruz Montoya Chimalnunc pro tunc to the day preceding the date of decedent's death.

9. As the minor child of decedent, Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal is conclusively presumed to have been wholly dependent upon him for support at the time of his death. *Page 5

10. Phillip B. Lohr has been duly appointed and qualified as the guardian ad litem for the minor child, Katie Cruz Montoya Chimal.

11. Although Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra was dependent upon decedent for support at the time of his death, pursuant to the current law of this state, she was not his widow and, therefore, is not entitled to receive compensation.

12. After the death of decedent, a funeral bill from International Mortuary Shipping in the amount of $3,495.00 was paid in full by Maria Isabel Chimal Becerra.

***********
Based upon the foregoing stipulations and findings of fact, the Full Commission makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. On October 7, 2009, decedent sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer that resulted in his death. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 97-2(6); 97-2(10).

2. Common law marriages are invalid in North Carolina.State v. Alford, 298 N.C. 465, 259 S.E.2d 242 (1979);State v. Wilson, 121 N.C. 650, 28 S.E. 416 (1897). Therefore, a person claiming to be a common law wife in North Carolina is not entitled to any part of the compensation payable under the provisions of the Act. Fields v. Hollowell,238 N.C. 614, 78 S.E.2d (1953); Reeves v. Parker-Graham-Sexton,Inc., 199 N.C. 236, 154 S.E. 66 (1930). Notwithstanding societal changes that have taken place since the filing of Fields v.Hollowell, 238 N.C. 614,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fields v. Hollowell & Hollowell
78 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Alford
259 S.E.2d 242 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Wilson
28 S.E. 416 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Reeves v. . Parker-Graham-Sexton, Inc.
154 S.E. 66 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Montoya-Chimal v. Care Heating, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montoya-chimal-v-care-heating-ncworkcompcom-2010.