Montondo v. Petty

21 A.D.2d 975, 252 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 975 (Montondo v. Petty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montondo v. Petty, 21 A.D.2d 975, 252 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to reapply upon appropriate papers. Memorandum: The papers submitted in support of the motion to serve an amended bill of particulars were inadequate in that there was no affidavit by a person with knowledge of the facts. Even though respondent failed to file any affidavits in opposition to the motion, in view of the appearance and oral argument by her counsel in opposition on the return day, the court was required to examine plaintiff’s moving papers and, if legally insufficient, to deny the motion. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting motion of plaintiff Ruth Montondo, to file an amended bill of particulars.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battaglia v. Hofmeister
100 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
George v. Dennis
58 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.2d 975, 252 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montondo-v-petty-nyappdiv-1964.