Montina v. State

692 So. 2d 1005, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4938, 1997 WL 228548
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 1997·No. No. 96-2588·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order requiring restitution under review is reversed because the “appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere based in part on the agreement that no restitution would be imposed. See Hunt v. State, 613 So.2d 893 (Fla.1992).” Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montina v. State, 692 So. 2d 1005, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4938, 1997 WL 228548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

692 So. 2d 1005 (Montina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. State
613 So. 2d 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Taylor v. State
672 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)