Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 999 F.3d 751
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 14, 2021·No. 20-1673E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 20-1673

NERIS MONTILLA, on behalf of herself and all others so similarly situated; MICHAEL KYRIAKAKIS, on behalf of himself and all others so similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

ROSELIA MONTUFAR, on behalf of herself and all others so similarly situated; RUBEN VELASQUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others so similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,

Defendants, Appellees,

MR. COOPER, f/k/a Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; SETERUS, INC.; C.I.T. BANK, N.A.,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on June 8, 2021, is amended as follows:

On page 14, line 10, replace "sue-and-be-sue" with "sue- and-be-sued".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, (1st Cir. 2021).

Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n (Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.