Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 20-1673
NERIS MONTILLA, on behalf of herself and all others so similarly situated; MICHAEL KYRIAKAKIS, on behalf of himself and all others so similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
ROSELIA MONTUFAR, on behalf of herself and all others so similarly situated; RUBEN VELASQUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others so similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,
Defendants, Appellees,
MR. COOPER, f/k/a Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; SETERUS, INC.; C.I.T. BANK, N.A.,
Defendants.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court, issued on June 8, 2021, is amended as follows:
On page 14, line 10, replace "sue-and-be-sue" with "sue- and-be-sued".
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n (Montilla v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.