Montijo v. Dixon
This text of Montijo v. Dixon (Montijo v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-3244 _____________________________
MICHAEL V. MONTIJO,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
August 27, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits.
ROWE, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Michael V. Montijo, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Montijo v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montijo-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.