Montie v. Davis, Gillingham & Associates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Montie v. Davis, Gillingham & Associates

429 So. 2d 1361, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20739

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1983·No. No. AN-27·Published

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Montie appeals a workers’ compensation order denying any benefits. We affirm.

There is competent substantial evidence that Montie’s bicycle ride was conducted for purely personal purposes. The injury sustained during this deviation from the employer’s business is not compensable, Sunshine Jr. Stores v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Montie appeals a workers’ compensation order denying any benefits. We affirm.

There is competent substantial evidence that Montie’s bicycle ride was conducted for purely personal purposes. The injury sustained during this deviation from the employer’s business is not compensable, Sunshine Jr. Stores v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Montie v. Davis, Gillingham & Associates, 429 So. 2d 1361, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20739 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

429 So. 2d 1361 (Montie v. Davis, Gillingham & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related