Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. Duer
This text of 46 Ga. 272 (Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. Duer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $1,033.57 for taxes illegally collected. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s declaration, which demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted. It is not alleged in the declaration in what manner the taxes received were illegally collected. That the taxes were illegally collected and received by the defendant, is the conclusion of the pleader. The facts going to show that the taxes had been illegally collected and received by the defendant, should have been alleged, so that the Court might judge whether, under the law applicable thereto, the taxes had been illegally collected and received. If the facts had been alleged, the Court could have determined whether the collection of taxes was legal or illegal. It is not sufficient for the plaintiff to allege that the collection of taxes was illegal, without alleging the facts which made it illegal.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Ga. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-west-point-railroad-v-duer-ga-1872.